Correct. Lion burgers. Well, not
just lion burgers. Because that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efda2/efda22f0fad74354bd13cdc220e1b74954cd14b1" alt=""
would be weird. No, they're lion AND antelope burgers. Mostly antelope. So, that should help, right? No. No, it kinda doesn't. Look, I'm not saying that they're disgusting or anything like that. I really don't know. I've never had a lion/antelope burger. (What would that be? Like a lintelope? Sounds fuzzy.) I just don't know that it's necessary, you know? According to
KTXL in Sacramento "There are rules and regulations for this type of thing, but the Flaming Grill says it's not breaking any. The business tells FOX40 it can't serve a burger with all lion meat, and it's supply is not imported from another country." Wait. What?
Then there's the alligator burger. I want to know what's the difference between alligator meat and crocodile meat. They seem like they're cousins, yet I never hear of crocodile being on a menu anywhere. And if it was going to be anywhere, I'd have to guess that this place would be it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3d7a/c3d7a71e90caac67d0cd17001c1273c95f43b68a" alt=""
There's your buffalo burger. Buffalo, the cousin of the yak. Still edible. Still odd. But it's not as odd as, of course, the llama burger. Behold!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85298/85298891c14646838d4c0e2cbc2bc3f9808c061e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef55/eef558866ffee2184432f4bcbc350a0df1cac1fc" alt=""
Llama? Who would even think of eating a llama? Why would you want to? They're the spitters, right? Yeah, I don't want spit-laden meat. Llamas look like they're half camel, half ostrich. I'm surprised those aren't on the menu at the Flaming Grill as well! But according to the Yelp-sters, there is kangaroo available on some occasions. (Now, I KNOW that isn't from this country! Explain the kangaroo!)
I'm not bagging on the Flaming Grill, but I really take issue with the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bb1/77bb1e8803561d641111a8e72e523b6ccf17f6b9" alt=""
whole "exotic food" concept. Most of the time, foods that are considered to be "exotic" were only eaten in the first place because the people who were eating them were starving to death at the time! They would have eaten each other if they could have! It's not like they were looking to do the "exotic" thing at the time. They ate what they could. But when you can eat things that are more plentiful (and normal), shouldn't we just stick with those? Do we really need to be eating llamas? I'm not so sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment