Classes have (nearly) come to an end. Or rather, this is the final official week of classes in the College, though I still have one more class to teach next week, during reading week. (We'll be discussing the final three student novellas in workshop.) Now that it's over, I can shout from the blogtops Conceptual Art/Writing class exhilarated me; I feel incredibly grateful to have had the opportunity to teach the class, and to have been able to do so with students who were willing to step out, as it became clear, on what sometimes initially appeared to be shifting ice. By which I mean, to be looking at, thinking about and creating work--and whose exemplars--that remain under tremendous contention. The class served as an intellectual transfusion for me, as it required me to think through a genealogy that was indistinct, but discernible, and put it together, in coherent fashion, for the class, while also making clear that this was only one reading of the history of this constellation of art forms. (It helped too that we have the graduate level Poetry and Poetics Working Group, because its conversations informed those in my class.) Now that I've done it, I feel I have a much clearer and deeper sense of conceptual art's history, its origins and antecedents, and its relation to and phantasmal presence in other canonical and non-canonical artforms. As I was saying to a friend, I feel capable now of reading backwards, before the coining of "conceptual art," to see conceptual practices in many different places and forms. (This was also the first time that I've taught the work of figures such as
Marcel Duchamp, John Cage, Andy Warhol, Kenneth Goldsmith, Rob Fitterman, Mendi + Keith Obadike, and many others.) The students all created 6-8 projects, grounded in language and its possibilities, and it was a delight to read them, and imagine how the ones containing the possibility of performance might be realized. One student proposed realizing them--performing some of them--during the assigned exam period, so we'll see how that turns out. At any rate, the class, like the other one I'm teaching, represents one of the most enjoyable aspects of teaching, which is transmitting knowledge to students, watching them learn, grow intellectually and create knowledge, and learning from them in the process. And who knows, down the road another
Yoko Ono or Marcel Duchamp might emerge from this experience.
+++
The
2010 FIFA World Cup begins in two weeks, on June 11, running till July 11, in
South Africa. This is the most watched sporting event in the world, and this is the first time it'll be held in Africa, with the host country leading a group of 32 national teams, including prior winners
England (1966),
France (1998),
Italy (1934, 1938, 1982, 2006),
Germany (1954, 1974, 1990),
Brazil (1958, 1962, 1970, 1994, 2002),
Uruguay (1930, 1950), and
Argentina (1978, 1986), and stalwarts such as
Netherlands, Japan, Portugal, Mexico, Denmark, Cameroon, South Korea, and, interestingly enough,
North Korea. Though the opening matches, pairing South Africa and Mexico, and Uruguay and France, will be held in
Johannesburg and
Cape Town respectively, subsequent matches will be held all over the country, culminating in the third place match at
Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium in
Port Elizabeth, and the championship match at
Soccer City in
Johannesburg.
The 1994 host of the tournament,
the United States, will also field a participating team this year, having made it through the qualifying rounds for the North/Central American region to finish first, with 20 points, just ahead of Mexico's 19. The US ended up in the Tournament's Group C, which also includes one of the tournament's best teams, England, but also
Algeria, which barely edged into first place in its Africa Group 6 matches, over
Gambia and
Senegal, and
Slovenia, which finished second to
Slovakia in its European Group 3. Getting by England (ranked 8th in the FIFA World Rankings) will be the US's (ranked 14th) major challenge, and few online commentators I've read give the US team much--any--chance of achieving this. Yet the US team had one of its best summers in 2009; in the Confederations Cup, the US ended up in Group B, with Brazil, Egypt and Italy, yet after losing to Italy (3-1) and Brazil (3-0), the US came back to finish second in its group, and reached the semifinal on tie-breaking goals, surpassing Italy. In the semifinals the US beat
Spain, then atop the FIFA World rankings, 2-0, losing to Brazil in the final 3-2, though they were up 2-0 at half-time, and had the game in hand. They must capitalize on any leads in South Africa, and do everything they can to keep the ball out of their defensive area, which is where they're far and away weakest.
The
23-person World Cup squad, recently finalized by coach
Bob Bradley, comprises a number of veterans from the 2008 campaign, in Germany: star goalie and Everton (English Premier League) mainstay
Tim Howard, forwards
Landon Donovan and
Clint Dempsey (above left), midfielders
DaMarcus Beasley and
Michael Bradley, and defenders
Oguchi Onyewu (at right) and
Steve Cherundolo. Newcomers include
Jozy Altidore (the 20-year-old sensation who scored a hat trick against
Trinidad and Tobago in a qualifying game),
Robbie Findley (top of article, right)
, José Francisco Torres, Ricardo Clark, Maurice Edu, and surprise picks
Edson Buddle and
Herculez Gomez. In a little remarked change, nearly 1/3rd of the US team are
black, and 1/2 of the team are either black or latino, a first for the US. The forward and midfield core are especially strong, and can hang with some of the best teams (except perhaps Brazil, Spain, and Portugal), but the US's defense remains an issue. Unaggressive play and defensive mistakes have doom the US, as does the absence of players competing in the world's top leagues, but the latter has gradually changed, and the US's own major league, the MLS, has gotten stronger with each passing year. If the defensive corps can keep mistakes to a minimum, they do stand a chance with Donovan, Bradley, Altidore, Findley, and Dempsey going hard.
It'll be interesting to see if host country South Africa gets a boost, as has often happened; France (1998), Argentina (1978), Germany (1974, as West Germany), England (1966), and Uruguay (1938) have won the tournament when hosting it, and most recently, Germany finished 3rd in 2006 and South Korea finished 4th in 2002 when serving as hosts. Moreover, the multibillion-dollar new stadiums and infrastructure the South African government
has built have been controversial in a country still suffering from severe gaps in income equality, and the threats of terrorism, violence and crime are also pressing. Just recently, on May 25, the Colombian team, which had not qualified for the tournament,
were robbed in their 5-star Johannesburg hotel of about $2600 in money and other personal goods. South Africa has repeated assured visitors that it has security and safety issues under control. Let us sincerely hope they do.
I will be certainly be watching closely and rooting avidly for the US and other teams, including Brazil. My prediction for the finals:
Brazil 3,
Portugal 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment